Government behind Nasheed’s verdict, Adeeb tells Supreme Court

Government behind Nasheed’s verdict, Adeeb tells Supreme Court
July 16 17:49 2017

Jailed former Vice President Ahmed Adeeb has alleged that the government engineered former President Mohamed Nasheed’s 13-year prison sentence in March 2015.

Nasheed’s legal team told the press on Sunday that Adeeb has asked the Supreme Court to review the opposition leader’s controversial terrorism conviction in a letter sent to Chief Justice Abdulla Saeed.

Adeeb alleged that Nasheed was prosecuted because he was leading a political campaign to free former Defence Minister Mohamed Nazim, who was arrested on a weapons smuggling charge in early February 2015. Nasheed was arrested less than two weeks later.

“I know that the verdict passed on [Nasheed] was not written by a judge from a judicial court and I know who prepared that verdict as well,” Adeeb wrote, adding that the “first draft” sentenced Nasheed to 10 years in jail with a three-year suspension.

“I have information that would prove that President Mohamed Nasheed’s verdict was produced by influencing both the judges who presided over the case as well as the entire judiciary,” he added.

Earlier this month, Adeeb, who is serving a 33-year jail sentence on multiple charges of graft and terrorism, also offered to prove Nazim’s innocence if the Supreme Court reviews his case.

The apex court upheld both Nasheed and Nazim’s verdicts despite widespread condemnation over apparent due process lapses, disqualifying both from challenging President Abdulla Yameen in next year’s presidential election.

In the face of the political crisis triggered by the imprisonment of the political opponents, Yameen maintained that the chief prosecutor and judiciary are independent of executive influence.

Nasheed was found guilty of ordering the military to “abduct” and detain the criminal court’s former chief judge in January 2012.

The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, a panel of independent human rights experts, later found that Nasheed’s imprisonment was illegal and “politically motivated”. The government failed to explain how the arrest of Judge Abdulla Mohamed, carried out by the Maldivian National Defence Forces under an order by a third party, could constitute terrorism, the rights group ruled in September 2015.

The 49-year-old was granted asylum in the UK in May last year after he was authorised to travel for medical treatment amid mounting international pressure.

Nasheed’s lawyers meanwhile told the press that the apex court has a responsibility to review the case in light of the new information from Adeeb.

“The letter to the Supreme Court from former Vice President Ahmed Adeeb is as stunning as it is unsurprising,” said Nasheed’s international lawyer Jared Genser.

“We already knew that the three judges in President Nasheed’s case were bribed to convict him. But Adeeb is now prepared to explain how the entire sham case against President Nasheed was fabricated and who was responsible.

“In light of these explosive revelations, which must be viewed as highly credible given Adeeb is also implicating himself in this wrongdoing, the Supreme Court must immediately interview him and then reverse President Nasheed’s conviction, exonerating him completely.”

write a comment


  1. Me
    July 17, 17:34 #1 Me

    “Nasheed’s lawyers” with no mention of Amal Clooney who works with her husband George to overturn Brexit and with Maldives “bi-partisan” buddy John McCain to overthrow Trump. The Clooneys are enemies of democracy and are involved with anything remitjry involving it.

    Reply to this comment
    • Confused (US) Patriot
      July 17, 21:21 Confused (US) Patriot

      I’m confused. I thought John Podesta, good friend of Hillary Clinton, was supporting the government. The Republicans are supporting the opposition. The Governmnt supports Islamic Extremists, the opposition is against extremism.

      The above must be FakeNews put out against us Patriots.

      Reply to this comment
      • waste of time
        July 19, 07:18 waste of time

        Podesta was paid to “support the current government”. He’s a lobbyist which means he will support anyone who hires him to do his job. I’m pretty sure American politicians in both parties, along with the U.S. government in general, don’t give 2 craps about Maldives. As for certain parties or politicians not supporting extremism, that is just plain false. Both Clinton and Trump love to get on their knees for the Saudis. And I don’t hear Democrats or Republicans complaining about the Saudi fundamentalist regime or their support for extremists around the world. Politics is about money, that is all. Politicians are really just white collar prostitutes.

        Reply to this comment

Add a Comment

Your data will be safe! Your e-mail address will not be published. Also other data will not be shared with third person.
All fields are required.